The issue of whether Fairtrade’s success is due to consumers
or to manufacturers and retailers is worth some thought. All
products should be traded in a way that provides a fair price for the farmer,
whether that farmer resides in Ghana or Gloucestershire, Caracas or Cumbria and any learning that can make farmer returns fairer merits consideration.
A look at Fairtrade figures shows that 90% of the £1.5
billion retail turnover of Fairtrade products is accounted for by sugar, chocolate,
coffee, tea and bananas, and by big food manufacturers and major supermarkets. Every banana sold in Sainsbury's and Waitrose is Fairtrade, as is every bar of Cadbury’s Dairy Milk Chocolate, every bar of
Nestle’s Kit Kat, and Mars Maltesers. All of Tate and Lyle’s sugar products are
sold under the Fairtrade banner. All the big supermarkets have a range of
Fairtrade teas and coffees.
Indeed it is hard to
avoid buying a Fairtrade product at some point in the weekly shop.
Not only have big companies pushed Fairtrade, they have done
so in a way that requires little sacrifice on the part of the shopper, for no
major player has added a price premium to their Fairtrade products, electing
instead to sell at the same price as they did prior to adopting the logo.
There is a lesson here – big companies are prepared to
swallow a hit to their margins if they see a benefit, and in Fairtrade they saw
a way to polish their ethical credentials at relatively little cost.
Mostly therefore the success of Fairtrade has little to do
with consumers demanding fairness for third world farmers. What the Fairtrade
people have done well though is to build a recognisable brand with a simple
message that appeals to consumers and allows them to feel good when they
purchase a Fairtrade product. Ten years ago few had heard of Fairtrade, but
now, according to the IGD, four out of five shoppers recognise the logo, and
just over a third say they have specifically chosen to purchase a Fair Trade
product
And it is this
undoubted consumer appeal that companies are harnessing when they adopt
Fairtrade accreditation.
So what about fair trading for British farmers? The tide
does seem to be turning. Scarred by the horsemeat scandal, and conscious that
the British public views farmers and home produced food in an increasingly
favourable light, manufacturers and retailers are slowly embracing closer, more
transparent relationships with producers. This is vital for as the Fairtrade story
shows, the lead has to come from players with clout and the ability to make
big, transformational decisions.
The Fairtrade story also illustrates the value of strong
branding, and here is where British farming could help itself and make a real
difference to the way in which the industry is perceived by consumers and
retailers alike. Replacing the Red Tractor with a recognised logo and brand
which stood for exceptional production standards, not just the bare legal
minimum would be a good start, as would tough policing of the standards.
The
twin aims should be to move consumers from a vague feeling that they should be
buying British into state of mind where they understand exactly why they should
support British farming; and to build a system that retailers feel they must be
part of to be credible with their customers.
No comments:
Post a Comment